Revision: 4130
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon Mar 15 07:03:36 2010
Log: Add static analysis to AST expressions that records whether a negative zero will be treated identically to a positive zero in the expression's context. Use this flag to avoid some tests in inlined smi code.
Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/965001
http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=4130

Modified:
 /branches/bleeding_edge/src/ast.h
 /branches/bleeding_edge/src/ia32/codegen-ia32.cc
 /branches/bleeding_edge/src/ia32/codegen-ia32.h
 /branches/bleeding_edge/src/rewriter.cc

=======================================
--- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/ast.h   Fri Mar 12 05:10:42 2010
+++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/ast.h   Mon Mar 15 07:03:36 2010
@@ -250,6 +250,14 @@
     bitfields_ &= ~SideEffectFreeField::mask();
     bitfields_ |= SideEffectFreeField::encode(is_side_effect_free);
   }
+
+  // Will the use of this expression treat -0 the same as 0 in all cases?
+  // If so, we can return 0 instead of -0 if we want to, to optimize code.
+ bool no_negative_zero() { return NoNegativeZeroField::decode(bitfields_); }
+  void set_no_negative_zero(bool no_negative_zero) {
+    bitfields_ &= ~NoNegativeZeroField::mask();
+    bitfields_ |= NoNegativeZeroField::encode(no_negative_zero);
+  }

   // Will ToInt32 (ECMA 262-3 9.5) or ToUint32 (ECMA 262-3 9.6)
   // be applied to the value of this expression?
@@ -270,7 +278,8 @@

   // Using template BitField<type, start, size>.
   class SideEffectFreeField : public BitField<bool, 0, 1> {};
-  class ToInt32Field : public BitField<bool, 1, 1> {};
+  class NoNegativeZeroField : public BitField<bool, 1, 1> {};
+  class ToInt32Field : public BitField<bool, 2, 1> {};
 };


=======================================
--- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/ia32/codegen-ia32.cc Thu Mar 11 08:24:31 2010 +++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/ia32/codegen-ia32.cc Mon Mar 15 07:03:36 2010
@@ -1102,7 +1102,8 @@

 void CodeGenerator::GenericBinaryOperation(Token::Value op,
                                            StaticType* type,
-                                           OverwriteMode overwrite_mode) {
+                                           OverwriteMode overwrite_mode,
+                                           bool no_negative_zero) {
   Comment cmnt(masm_, "[ BinaryOperation");
   Comment cmnt_token(masm_, Token::String(op));

@@ -1170,10 +1171,12 @@
     answer = stub.GenerateCall(masm_, frame_, &left, &right);
   } else if (right_is_smi_constant) {
     answer = ConstantSmiBinaryOperation(op, &left, right.handle(),
-                                        type, false, overwrite_mode);
+                                        type, false, overwrite_mode,
+                                        no_negative_zero);
   } else if (left_is_smi_constant) {
     answer = ConstantSmiBinaryOperation(op, &right, left.handle(),
-                                        type, true, overwrite_mode);
+                                        type, true, overwrite_mode,
+                                        no_negative_zero);
   } else {
     // Set the flags based on the operation, type and loop nesting level.
     // Bit operations always assume they likely operate on Smis. Still only
@@ -1184,7 +1187,8 @@
         (Token::IsBitOp(op) ||
          operands_type.IsInteger32() ||
          type->IsLikelySmi())) {
-      answer = LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, &left, &right, overwrite_mode);
+      answer = LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, &left, &right,
+                                        overwrite_mode, no_negative_zero);
     } else {
       GenericBinaryOpStub stub(op,
                                overwrite_mode,
@@ -1291,7 +1295,8 @@
 Result CodeGenerator::LikelySmiBinaryOperation(Token::Value op,
                                                Result* left,
                                                Result* right,
- OverwriteMode overwrite_mode) { + OverwriteMode overwrite_mode,
+                                               bool no_negative_zero) {
   Result answer;
   // Special handling of div and mod because they use fixed registers.
   if (op == Token::DIV || op == Token::MOD) {
@@ -1395,13 +1400,16 @@
       // Check for negative zero result.  If result is zero, and divisor
       // is negative, return a floating point negative zero.  The
       // virtual frame is unchanged in this block, so local control flow
-      // can use a Label rather than a JumpTarget.
-      Label non_zero_result;
-      __ test(left->reg(), Operand(left->reg()));
-      __ j(not_zero, &non_zero_result);
-      __ test(right->reg(), Operand(right->reg()));
-      deferred->Branch(negative);
-      __ bind(&non_zero_result);
+      // can use a Label rather than a JumpTarget.  If the context of this
+      // expression will treat -0 like 0, do not do this test.
+      if (!no_negative_zero) {
+        Label non_zero_result;
+        __ test(left->reg(), Operand(left->reg()));
+        __ j(not_zero, &non_zero_result);
+        __ test(right->reg(), Operand(right->reg()));
+        deferred->Branch(negative);
+        __ bind(&non_zero_result);
+      }
       // Check for the corner case of dividing the most negative smi by
       // -1. We cannot use the overflow flag, since it is not set by
       // idiv instruction.
@@ -1423,12 +1431,14 @@
       // the dividend is negative, return a floating point negative
       // zero.  The frame is unchanged in this block, so local control
       // flow can use a Label rather than a JumpTarget.
-      Label non_zero_result;
-      __ test(edx, Operand(edx));
-      __ j(not_zero, &non_zero_result, taken);
-      __ test(left->reg(), Operand(left->reg()));
-      deferred->Branch(negative);
-      __ bind(&non_zero_result);
+      if (!no_negative_zero) {
+        Label non_zero_result;
+        __ test(edx, Operand(edx));
+        __ j(not_zero, &non_zero_result, taken);
+        __ test(left->reg(), Operand(left->reg()));
+        deferred->Branch(negative);
+        __ bind(&non_zero_result);
+      }
       deferred->BindExit();
       left->Unuse();
       right->Unuse();
@@ -1571,14 +1581,16 @@
       // argument is negative, go to slow case.  The frame is unchanged
       // in this block, so local control flow can use a Label rather
       // than a JumpTarget.
-      Label non_zero_result;
-      __ test(answer.reg(), Operand(answer.reg()));
-      __ j(not_zero, &non_zero_result, taken);
-      __ mov(answer.reg(), left->reg());
-      __ or_(answer.reg(), Operand(right->reg()));
-      deferred->Branch(negative);
- __ xor_(answer.reg(), Operand(answer.reg())); // Positive 0 is correct.
-      __ bind(&non_zero_result);
+      if (!no_negative_zero) {
+        Label non_zero_result;
+        __ test(answer.reg(), Operand(answer.reg()));
+        __ j(not_zero, &non_zero_result, taken);
+        __ mov(answer.reg(), left->reg());
+        __ or_(answer.reg(), Operand(right->reg()));
+        deferred->Branch(negative);
+ __ xor_(answer.reg(), Operand(answer.reg())); // Positive 0 is correct.
+        __ bind(&non_zero_result);
+      }
       break;
     }

@@ -1817,7 +1829,8 @@
                                                  Handle<Object> value,
                                                  StaticType* type,
                                                  bool reversed,
- OverwriteMode overwrite_mode) { + OverwriteMode overwrite_mode,
+                                                 bool no_negative_zero) {
   // NOTE: This is an attempt to inline (a bit) more of the code for
   // some possible smi operations (like + and -) when (at least) one
   // of the operands is a constant smi.
@@ -1828,10 +1841,10 @@
     Result unsafe_operand(value);
     if (reversed) {
       return LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, &unsafe_operand, operand,
-                                      overwrite_mode);
+                                      overwrite_mode, no_negative_zero);
     } else {
       return LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, operand, &unsafe_operand,
-                                      overwrite_mode);
+                                      overwrite_mode, no_negative_zero);
     }
   }

@@ -1911,7 +1924,7 @@
       if (reversed) {
         Result constant_operand(value);
         answer = LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, &constant_operand, operand,
-                                          overwrite_mode);
+ overwrite_mode, no_negative_zero);
       } else {
         // Only the least significant 5 bits of the shift value are used.
         // In the slow case, this masking is done inside the runtime call.
@@ -1947,7 +1960,7 @@
       if (reversed) {
         Result constant_operand(value);
         answer = LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, &constant_operand, operand,
-                                          overwrite_mode);
+ overwrite_mode, no_negative_zero);
       } else {
         // Only the least significant 5 bits of the shift value are used.
         // In the slow case, this masking is done inside the runtime call.
@@ -2140,10 +2153,10 @@
         Result constant_operand(value);
         if (reversed) {
           answer = LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, &constant_operand, operand,
-                                            overwrite_mode);
+ overwrite_mode, no_negative_zero);
         } else {
           answer = LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, operand, &constant_operand,
-                                            overwrite_mode);
+ overwrite_mode, no_negative_zero);
         }
       }
       break;
@@ -2180,10 +2193,10 @@
       Result constant_operand(value);
       if (reversed) {
         answer = LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, &constant_operand, operand,
-                                          overwrite_mode);
+ overwrite_mode, no_negative_zero);
       } else {
         answer = LikelySmiBinaryOperation(op, operand, &constant_operand,
-                                          overwrite_mode);
+ overwrite_mode, no_negative_zero);
       }
       break;
     }
@@ -4950,7 +4963,8 @@
          node->value()->AsBinaryOperation()->ResultOverwriteAllowed());
     GenericBinaryOperation(node->binary_op(),
                            node->type(),
- overwrite_value ? OVERWRITE_RIGHT : NO_OVERWRITE); + overwrite_value ? OVERWRITE_RIGHT : NO_OVERWRITE,
+                           node->no_negative_zero());
   } else {
     Load(node->value());
   }
@@ -5027,7 +5041,8 @@
          node->value()->AsBinaryOperation()->ResultOverwriteAllowed());
     GenericBinaryOperation(node->binary_op(),
                            node->type(),
- overwrite_value ? OVERWRITE_RIGHT : NO_OVERWRITE); + overwrite_value ? OVERWRITE_RIGHT : NO_OVERWRITE,
+                           node->no_negative_zero());
   } else {
     Load(node->value());
   }
@@ -5106,7 +5121,8 @@
          node->value()->AsBinaryOperation()->ResultOverwriteAllowed());
     GenericBinaryOperation(node->binary_op(),
                            node->type(),
- overwrite_value ? OVERWRITE_RIGHT : NO_OVERWRITE); + overwrite_value ? OVERWRITE_RIGHT : NO_OVERWRITE,
+                           node->no_negative_zero());
   } else {
     Load(node->value());
   }
@@ -6868,7 +6884,8 @@
       Load(node->left());
       Load(node->right());
     }
-    GenericBinaryOperation(node->op(), node->type(), overwrite_mode);
+    GenericBinaryOperation(node->op(), node->type(),
+                           overwrite_mode, node->no_negative_zero());
   }
 }

=======================================
--- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/ia32/codegen-ia32.h     Thu Mar 11 08:24:31 2010
+++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/ia32/codegen-ia32.h     Mon Mar 15 07:03:36 2010
@@ -469,7 +469,8 @@
   void GenericBinaryOperation(
       Token::Value op,
       StaticType* type,
-      OverwriteMode overwrite_mode);
+      OverwriteMode overwrite_mode,
+      bool no_negative_zero);

   // If possible, combine two constant smi values using op to produce
   // a smi result, and push it on the virtual frame, all at compile time.
@@ -483,7 +484,8 @@
                                     Handle<Object> constant_operand,
                                     StaticType* type,
                                     bool reversed,
-                                    OverwriteMode overwrite_mode);
+                                    OverwriteMode overwrite_mode,
+                                    bool no_negative_zero);

   // Emit code to perform a binary operation on two likely smis.
   // The code to handle smi arguments is produced inline.
@@ -491,7 +493,8 @@
   Result LikelySmiBinaryOperation(Token::Value op,
                                   Result* left,
                                   Result* right,
-                                  OverwriteMode overwrite_mode);
+                                  OverwriteMode overwrite_mode,
+                                  bool no_negative_zero);

   void Comparison(AstNode* node,
                   Condition cc,
=======================================
--- /branches/bleeding_edge/src/rewriter.cc     Tue Mar  9 02:39:18 2010
+++ /branches/bleeding_edge/src/rewriter.cc     Mon Mar 15 07:03:36 2010
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@


 void AstOptimizer::VisitConditional(Conditional* node) {
+  node->condition()->set_no_negative_zero(true);
   Visit(node->condition());
   Visit(node->then_expression());
   Visit(node->else_expression());
@@ -319,6 +320,7 @@
       node->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
       node->target()->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
       node->value()->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
+      node->value()->set_no_negative_zero(true);
       break;
     case Token::ASSIGN_ADD:
     case Token::ASSIGN_SUB:
@@ -393,6 +395,7 @@


 void AstOptimizer::VisitProperty(Property* node) {
+  node->key()->set_no_negative_zero(true);
   Visit(node->obj());
   Visit(node->key());
 }
@@ -422,6 +425,11 @@


 void AstOptimizer::VisitUnaryOperation(UnaryOperation* node) {
+  if (node->op() == Token::ADD || node->op() == Token::SUB) {
+    node->expression()->set_no_negative_zero(node->no_negative_zero());
+  } else {
+    node->expression()->set_no_negative_zero(true);
+  }
   Visit(node->expression());
   if (FLAG_safe_int32_compiler) {
     switch (node->op()) {
@@ -449,6 +457,9 @@

 void AstOptimizer::VisitCountOperation(CountOperation* node) {
   // Count operations assume that they work on Smis.
+  node->expression()->set_no_negative_zero(node->is_prefix() ?
+                                           true :
+                                           node->no_negative_zero());
   node->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
   node->expression()->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
   Visit(node->expression());
@@ -461,7 +472,12 @@
   switch (node->op()) {
     case Token::COMMA:
     case Token::OR:
+      node->left()->set_no_negative_zero(true);
+      node->right()->set_no_negative_zero(node->no_negative_zero());
+      break;
     case Token::AND:
+      node->left()->set_no_negative_zero(node->no_negative_zero());
+      node->right()->set_no_negative_zero(node->no_negative_zero());
       break;
     case Token::BIT_OR:
     case Token::BIT_XOR:
@@ -474,6 +490,8 @@
       node->right()->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
       node->left()->set_to_int32(true);
       node->right()->set_to_int32(true);
+      node->left()->set_no_negative_zero(true);
+      node->right()->set_no_negative_zero(true);
       break;
     case Token::ADD:
     case Token::SUB:
@@ -484,6 +502,13 @@
         node->left()->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
         node->right()->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
       }
+      node->left()->set_no_negative_zero(node->no_negative_zero());
+      node->right()->set_no_negative_zero(node->no_negative_zero());
+      if (node->op() == Token::DIV) {
+        node->right()->set_no_negative_zero(false);
+      } else if (node->op() == Token::MOD) {
+        node->right()->set_no_negative_zero(true);
+      }
       break;
     default:
       UNREACHABLE();
@@ -550,6 +575,10 @@
     node->left()->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
     node->right()->type()->SetAsLikelySmiIfUnknown();
   }
+
+  node->left()->set_no_negative_zero(true);
+  // Only [[HasInstance]] has the right argument passed unchanged to it.
+  node->right()->set_no_negative_zero(true);

   Visit(node->left());
   Visit(node->right());

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to