http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3 File test/es5conform/es5conform.status (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode39 test/es5conform/es5conform.status:39: # We are compatible with safary and firefox. On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
Safari and Firefox
Done. http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode91 test/es5conform/es5conform.status:91: # Our Function object has a "arguments" property which is used as a non On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
has a -> has an non property -> non-property
Done. http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode96 test/es5conform/es5conform.status:96: # property in in the test. On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
non property and again below.
Done. http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode230 test/es5conform/es5conform.status:230: # is no longer traversed. On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
Is this a wrong test?
This test has actually been removed, I deleted the line. http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode257 test/es5conform/es5conform.status:257: # Wrong tests, path in test file is wrong. This will chrash the test On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
chrash -> crash
Done. http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode275 test/es5conform/es5conform.status:275: # RegExp.prototype is not of type RegExp - we are bug compatible with safari. On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
safari -> JSC or Safari and again below
Done. http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode291 test/es5conform/es5conform.status:291: # See http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=753 On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
Please add a couple of words on the subject of the bug to jog people's
memory. Done. http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/show -- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
