Addressed all the comments. Also changed the call site cache to use a near
label, saving 4 bytes.


http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/hydrogen.cc
File src/hydrogen.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/hydrogen.cc#newcode4851
src/hydrogen.cc:4851: // residing in new space. If it is the assumption
used for optimization is
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
Simplify to: If it is we assume that the function will stay the same?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/hydrogen.cc#newcode4862
src/hydrogen.cc:4862: Handle<JSGlobalPropertyCell> cell =
Handle<JSGlobalPropertyCell>::null();
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
Do you need the cell declaration out here? Can't you move it into the
if where
you actually fetch the value?

Don't need the cell at all, can just use lookup.GetValue.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/hydrogen.cc#newcode4878
src/hydrogen.cc:4878: // If the traget is not null we have found a known
global function that is
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
traget -> target

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc
File src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode4977
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:4977: // This code can patch an call site
inlined cache of the instance of check,
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
an call site -> a call site

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode4983
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:4983: // address to the cmp instruction just
just below the return address.
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
just just -> just

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode4985
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:4985: //   esp[4] : delta from return
address to cmp instruction
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
You should add to this comment that call site patching only happens
when args
are in registers. Begin the generation function with:

ASSERT(HasArgsInRegisters() || !HasCallSiteInlineCheck())

?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode5041
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:5041: // Update the global instanceof cache
with the current map and function. The
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
global -> global or inlined?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode5050
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:5050: // The constatns in for the code
patching are based on no push instructions
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
constatns in for -> constants for

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode5056
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:5056: __ add(Operand(scratch),
Immediate(2));
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
Named constant? Also, can't this be part of the operand in the move
below?

Can you generate code when running with --debug-code that checks that
you are
patching a cmp instruction here? Similarly for the moves that you
patch below?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode5084
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:5084: __ add(Operand(scratch),
Immediate(13));
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
Named constant? Combine with move?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode5103
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:5103: __ add(Operand(scratch),
Immediate(13));
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
Same here.

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode5154
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:5154:
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
two blank lines between functions

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode5156
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:5156:
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
Two blanks.

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode5179
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:5179: "InstanceofStub%s%s",
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
Isn't there a %s missing here?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc
File src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc#newcode1759
src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc:1759: // instance off stub.
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
off -> of

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc#newcode1803
src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc:1803:
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
Remove extra newline?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc#newcode1807
src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc:1807: // offset to the location where
to patch the map.
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
to the location of the map check?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc#newcode1823
src/ia32/lithium-codegen-ia32.cc:1823: // Put the result value into the
eax slot and restore all registres.
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
registres -> registers

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/lithium-ia32.h
File src/ia32/lithium-ia32.h (left):

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/ia32/lithium-ia32.h#oldcode975
src/ia32/lithium-ia32.h:975:
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
Accidental edit?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/lithium-allocator.h
File src/lithium-allocator.h (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/diff/16001/src/lithium-allocator.h#newcode800
src/lithium-allocator.h:800: // Marks the current instruction as a
requiring saving double registers.
On 2011/01/04 17:25:58, Mads Ager wrote:
as a -> as

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/5990005/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to