Hi Alexandre,

can you please file a bug with all the information you have available?


Regards,
Karl

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Alexandre Rames
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Yes it is ready. I'll ask Martyn if he can upload it now.
> But another segfault still remains :(  r6166 breaks the v8 benchmarks. I
> get a segfault on the hardware (simulator is too slow and is still running.)
> I'm looking at it. It'd be great if we could look to fix these bugs.
>
> Alexandre
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Karl Klose <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> do you have a patch ready for your bug fix (regarding StoreNamedField)
>> that you can upload for review?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> 2011/1/4 Søren Gjesse <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Alexandre,
>>>
>>> Thank you for looking int completing the crankshaft ARM port.
>>>
>>> In r6155 the following went in
>>>
>>>   DoJSArrayLength
>>>    DoLoadNamedField
>>>   DoCallConstantFunction
>>>   DoBoundsCheck
>>>   DoCheckPrototypeMaps
>>>
>>> We will keep from working on the rest you mentioned.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Søren
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 14:49, Mads Sig Ager <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Alexandre,
>>>>
>>>> please do upload your changes. We have custom expectations for running
>>>> crankshaft on ARM. If you notice a bug, put the failing tests on the
>>>> test list and file a bug report that you assign to yourself. We will
>>>> keep on trucking and things will pick up quickly. If you do not upload
>>>> small changes it will drown and we will duplicate work.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!    -- Mads
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Alexandre Rames
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > Hell everyone,
>>>> > I saw a patch by Karl this morning, where implemented a few ARM
>>>> Lithium
>>>> > stubs
>>>> > http://codereview.chromium.org/6069010/
>>>> > I had been working on a few of these too, but I was fixing other bugs
>>>> > discovered and I did not upload them.
>>>> > So that we don't overlap, here is a list of the ARM LCodeGen stubs I
>>>> have
>>>> > implemented over the last few days.
>>>> > DoStoreNamedField
>>>> > DoLoadNamedField
>>>> > DoIsNull
>>>> > DoClassOfTestAndBranch
>>>> > DoCmpMapAndBranch
>>>> > DoCheckPrototypeMaps
>>>> > DoCallConstantFunction
>>>> > DoLoadElements
>>>> > DoArrayLength
>>>> > DoBoundsCheck
>>>> > DoLoadKeyedFastElement
>>>> > DoStoreKeyedFastElement
>>>> > Also I mentioned a bug I found in LCodeGen::DoBranch that appeared
>>>> when both
>>>> > DoLoadNamedField and DoStoreNamedField are implemented.
>>>> > The fix is very simple and we should upload it today. However this
>>>> does not
>>>> > solve all our problems: another (hopefully not too many) bug is hiding
>>>> after
>>>> > this one.
>>>> > I'll start uploading the other stubs when these bugs are fixed.
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Alexandre
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > v8-dev mailing list
>>>> > [email protected]
>>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> v8-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> v8-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> v8-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>>
>
>  --
> v8-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
>

-- 
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to