LGTM.

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:44 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2011/01/13 13:06:51, Vitaly wrote:
>
>> http://codereview.chromium.org/6237002/diff/1/src/ia32/lithium-ia32.h
>> File src/ia32/lithium-ia32.h (right):
>>
>
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6237002/diff/1/src/ia32/lithium-ia32.h#newcode533
>
>> src/ia32/lithium-ia32.h:533: this->SetInputAt(0, left);
>> On 2011/01/13 13:03:25, fschneider wrote:
>> > On 2011/01/13 11:44:07, Vitaly wrote:
>> > > We could have a convenience function SetInputs(inputs...) defined for
>> up
>>
> to
>
>> > > certain number of input operands, so that in all instruction
>> subclasses we
>> > could
>> > > write:
>> > > LSubclass(LOperand* op1, ..., LOperand* opN) {
>> > >   this->SetInputs(op1, ..., opN);
>> > > }
>> > > This could also be done for temps.
>> >
>> > For this change I'd like to leave it more verbose - but I'm open for
>> > improvements for the future.
>> >
>> > I don't think I can make the number of parameters depend on a template
>> > parameter, so these would need to be virtual? (which I want to avoid) -
>>
> maybe
>
>> a
>> > macro would work?
>>
>
>  To implement this you define the function N times (for 1 to N arguments)
>> and
>> rely on the nice property that unused parts of a template are not
>> instantiated
>> and so their presence won't cause an error.
>>
>
> That would work. - but I'm not yet sure if we may get rid of constructors
> completely in the future, so I rather wait with this. For now it's not that
> much
> boilerplate code.
>
>
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6237002/
>

-- 
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to