Landed in revision 6918

On 2011/02/23 18:12:10, Martin Maly wrote:
Thanks, Lasse, for reviewing.

Rico, if you are ok with the change, feel free to commit it and update the
build
bots.

Thank you!
Martin

http://codereview.chromium.org/6542066/diff/1/test/sputnik/sputnik.status
File test/sputnik/sputnik.status (right):


http://codereview.chromium.org/6542066/diff/1/test/sputnik/sputnik.status#newcode193
test/sputnik/sputnik.status:193: # with undefined/null. Test expects
otherwise.
On 2011/02/23 06:12:32, Lasse Reichstein wrote:
> Object.prototype.toString has special cases for null and undefined as the
two
> first steps of the algorithm. After that, it does ToObject on the remaining
> values.

Cleaned up. These 2 failures are captured below as well as a V8 bug.


http://codereview.chromium.org/6542066/diff/1/test/sputnik/sputnik.status#newcode199
test/sputnik/sputnik.status:199: # V8 should not wrap this when calling
builtin
functions
On 2011/02/23 06:12:32, Lasse Reichstein wrote:
> We should have avoided that already. Are we wrapping this now?

not wrapping for builtins is on my todo list still. Some builtins may already work but not the builtins implemented in javascript themselves. Once that's
done, all these tests will start passing.


http://codereview.chromium.org/6542066/diff/1/test/sputnik/sputnik.status#newcode223
test/sputnik/sputnik.status:223: S15.3_A3_T1: FAIL
On 2011/02/23 06:12:32, Lasse Reichstein wrote:
> Agree.

Done.


http://codereview.chromium.org/6542066/diff/1/test/sputnik/sputnik.status#newcode225
test/sputnik/sputnik.status:225: S15.3_A3_T3: FAIL
On 2011/02/23 06:12:32, Lasse Reichstein wrote:
> And agree.
> The tests did depend on a variable not being present before the assignment
to
> the global property.

Done.



http://codereview.chromium.org/6542066/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to