http://codereview.chromium.org/6879081/diff/1/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc
File src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/6879081/diff/1/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc#newcode1983
src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc:1983: if (!mode_ == UNARY_OVERWRITE) {
On 2011/04/20 19:13:30, Erik Corry wrote:
!mode_ == should be mode_ !=

... or even clearer: mode == UNARY_NO_OVERWRITE (Uncle Bob says: Don't
use negation ;-) My code was based on GenericUnaryOpStub::Generate,
which has a similar comparison, but I guess that GenericUnaryOpStub can
be nuked soon, anyway.

http://codereview.chromium.org/6879081/diff/1/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc#newcode1987
src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc:1987: __ AllocateHeapNumber(r2, r3, r4, r6,
slow);
On 2011/04/20 19:13:30, Erik Corry wrote:
This will generate a type transition on a GC.  That gives wrong type
feedback to
the Cranker because it goes generic.

I don't understand that one. Could you elaborate, please?

http://codereview.chromium.org/6879081/diff/1/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc#newcode2003
src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc:2003: __ Call(stub.GetCode(),
RelocInfo::CODE_TARGET);
On 2011/04/20 19:13:30, Erik Corry wrote:
tail call

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/6879081/diff/1/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc#newcode2004
src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc:2004: __ pop(lr);
On 2011/04/20 19:13:30, Erik Corry wrote:
Instead of push-call-pop you can use a tail call ie a jump.

I guess that this means simply using __ Jump(...) here. For clarity,
I've moved the Ret into the if branch where it belongs then.

http://codereview.chromium.org/6879081/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to