This seems to be implemented more complicatedly than necessary. Please clarify.

http://codereview.chromium.org/8822014/diff/1/src/mips/lithium-codegen-mips.cc
File src/mips/lithium-codegen-mips.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/8822014/diff/1/src/mips/lithium-codegen-mips.cc#newcode3000
src/mips/lithium-codegen-mips.cc:3000:
From what I can see, you don't need to reserve an additional temp
register (and change register allocation in lithium-mips.cc) if you can
already take advantage of a double_scratch0().
Or is this double_scratch0() somehow related to kDoubleRegZero?

http://codereview.chromium.org/8822014/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to