lgtm

http://codereview.chromium.org/9124004/diff/1/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc
File src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/9124004/diff/1/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc#newcode5398
src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc:5398: __ and_(hash, hash,
Operand(kHashShiftCutOffMask));
Shouldn't it be SetCC? (instead of SetCC on the one above).

http://codereview.chromium.org/9124004/diff/1/src/mips/code-stubs-mips.cc
File src/mips/code-stubs-mips.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/9124004/diff/1/src/mips/code-stubs-mips.cc#newcode5621
src/mips/code-stubs-mips.cc:5621: // if (hash == 0) hash = 27;
should not there be some special masking here?

http://codereview.chromium.org/9124004/diff/1/src/objects.h
File src/objects.h (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/9124004/diff/1/src/objects.h#newcode6080
src/objects.h:6080: static const uint32_t kHashBitMask = 0xffffffffu >>
kHashShift;
this constant is duplicated in every code generator.

http://codereview.chromium.org/9124004/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to