Thanks, I merge this CL to https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/12225099/
and
am going to close this issue.
https://codereview.chromium.org/12224035/diff/8001/src/objects.h
File src/objects.h (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/12224035/diff/8001/src/objects.h#newcode4697
src/objects.h:4697: // the number of codes is less than the length of
the array.
On 2013/02/14 10:40:52, Michael Starzinger wrote:
Can we also add a sentence stating that the order of the code objects
within a
group is not preserved by this implementation?
Done.
https://codereview.chromium.org/12224035/diff/8001/src/objects.h#newcode4719
src/objects.h:4719: inline void clear_code_at(int i);
On 2013/02/14 10:40:52, Michael Starzinger wrote:
As discussed offline: Can we (visually) separate the low-level from
the
high-level accessors? The low-level ones should only be used by the
GC, adding a
comment in that regard would help to clarify that.
Done.
https://codereview.chromium.org/12224035/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
