On 2013/06/12 21:45:32, arv wrote:
Feedback wanted.
This implements Array.prototype.{values,keys,entries}
It currently depends on Symbol for the private state. Is there an
alternative
here to not have this dependency? It seems silly to have to implement the
array
iterator in C++ to work around that.
Looks good so far.
Unfortunately, the only alternative to symbols seem to be weak maps, but
they'd
be significantly more expensive. I honestly don't know what we should do
about
this problem in general. I already feel tempted to add some non-standard
API for
true private names/properties...
https://codereview.chromium.org/16848004/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
