Agreed, having the same ordering would be good, we'll work on it but not immediately.
On 17 February 2014 14:23, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2014/02/17 14:13:10, ulan wrote: > >> > Do any other V8 team members have an opinion? >> > > I don't have strong opinion on this, but I find A64 version of Pop a bit >> > easier > >> to read. >> > > In the following example in A64, the popping order is the same as the >> "reading >> order": >> Pop(a); >> Pop(b, c); >> Pop(d); >> > > So it is easy to see that we pop a, then b, then c, then d. >> > > In ARM, this example would be: >> Pop(a); >> Pop(c, b); >> Pop(d); >> > > So we need to read top-to-down, right-to-left. >> > > I agree that Push/Pop on ARM and A64 should agree on order of arguments, >> otherwise it is confusing. >> > > Ok if the consensus is that this ordering is easier to read I'm fine with > that, > but I definitely think we should move Arm across to the same model to avoid > confusion. > > > https://codereview.chromium.org/169533002/ > > -- > -- > v8-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev > ---You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "v8-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- -- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
