Comment #8 on issue 3246 by [email protected]: Weak references should
be handled uniformly
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3246
Continuing #6: ... and by using another word one can easily get the
equivalent of
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/ref/PhantomReference.html
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/ref/ReferenceQueue.html
This additional word is used to link things in the queue when they get
phantom reachable. Can we get rid of that additional word? Not sure, but I
don't think so.
I just wanted to mention that because the idea of phantom references is
floating around for some time, and most of the time people (including
us ;-) want phantom references, not weak references.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
