On 2014/06/04 11:06:41, marja wrote:
Cool, I'll have another look when you get PreParser sorted out.
On 2014/06/04 11:02:55, aperez wrote:
> Sounds good to me. Let's try to have this one CL landed first, and then
> refactor the checks, as you suggest.
I actually meant the other way around: It would be good if you could land
the
refactoring first, so that you don't need to land duplicate code. It would
make
this CL smaller, too.
Oh, somehow my brain parsed it the other way around... There is indeed no
problem
in making the refactoring first O:-)
https://codereview.chromium.org/160073006/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
