2008/10/9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Oct 9, 1:48 pm, "Simon Ask Ulsnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The other approach is to specify the full path to the build >>> directory's libv8.so in your g+ link line, but that's a dreadful hack, >>> and quick test programs linked that way should never be deployed. >> >> This is a perfectly valid and standard way of dealing with this: >> >> g++ -o your_target -I/path/to/v8 your_source_file.cpp /path/to/v8/libv8.a > > Linking to libv8.a is a "perfectly valid and standard way" of linking > to libv8.so? :P > > Methinks you didn't read what I wrote carefully enough before > replying. :-))))
Yes, static linking is not a bad thing, and I explained why it is often desirable with V8. The insulting tone of your posts annoys me increasingly, so I will leave it to someone else to reply to them from now on. Cheers! - Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
