Yes, Set works for standard properties, but not when you need accessors. I needed getters, hence the __proto__ trick. I still don't know how to do setters though, but luckily I don't need those (for now).
On Jul 20, 7:52 pm, Matthias Ernst <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:41 PM, TB<[email protected]> wrote: > > > I just found a possible solution to this problem. I feel it's a bit > > hack-ish, but it works, so I'm not really complaining. > > The trick is to create an ObjectTemplate with the appropriate getters > > or properties, and then do: > > funcTemplate->Set(v8::String::New("__proto__"),objTemplate); > > You should just as well be able to Set these properties on the > funcTemplate instead. > Or even on the funcTemplate->GetFunction() object, since there is only > gonna be one object created from that template anyway. > > > > > I honestly don't know how I couldn't have thought of that before, > > guess I was too caught up in reading all the definitions and > > implementation of FunctionTemplate to notice a solution this trivial. > > > On Jul 20, 7:00 pm, TB <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, > > >> I'm trying to make a function-template that apart from having some > >> default functions or values on new instances and the prototype also > >> has some default properties (getters, to be more specific) on the > >> actual function object. > >> Something like the following Javascript example: > > >> function SillyString(str) { > >> this.str=str; > >> return this;} > > >> SillyString.prototype.silly=function() { > >> print("Silly"+this.str);} > > >> //This is the part that I can't find out: > >> SillyString.__defineGetter__("default",function() { return new > >> SillyString("String"); }); > >> //Usage example > >> var y=new SillyString("HelloWorld"); //<-- this should be possible > >> var y=SillyString.default; //<-- Should return the equivalent of new > >> SillyString("String"); > > >> Would anyone have any idea how to go about doing this ? I've tried > >> using just an ObjectTemplate with a SetCallAsFunctionHandler, but that > >> throws a type error when used with "new". > > >> Thanks, > >> TB --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
