Oh!
I didn't look in details at gcl and I thought it was actually running
separatly from svn.
I get back to this then.

Regards,

Alexandre

On Jan 18, 1:36 pm, Søren Gjesse <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alexandre,
>
> This sounds great, it will be really interesting to see your MIPS code. If
> you cannot get gcl to consider the new files in src/mips it might be that
> you have not added these to svn. You need to do svn add to the src/mips
> directory and each of the files in it for gcl to add them to you change..
>
> regards,
> Søren
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 20:35, Alexandre Rames 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I am ready to contribute the code. Everything has been cleaned, and I
> > checked everything works fine.
> > I have the gcl client, but will it seems I can't commit with this
> > since it won't consider mips files.
> > I can provide an archive with the src/mips folder and a patch for
> > architecture independent files.
>
> > Alexandre
>
> > On Jan 14, 12:01 am, Erik Corry <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 2010/1/14 Alexandre Rames <[email protected]>
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > It seems the previous post about porting v8 to MIPS is too old and I
> > > > can't post there anymore.
>
> > > > I have started coding a MIPS simulator this week, and I am almost done
> > > > with it. How was the ARM simulator tested? Testing thoroughly that
> > > > every instruction behaves exactly as it should is quite some work, so
> > > > if you have any other idea it would be welcome.
>
> > > I think if it is capable of running V8 then that is fine.  In particular
> > any
> > > instructions that the V8 code generator doesn't generate don't need to be
> > > implemented, though they should stop execution if they are encountered.
> >  Any
> > > tests you want to add in order to aid your development process should
> > > probably be added as assembler tests like the ones in
> > > test/cctest/test-assembler-*.cc.  They would test the simulator when run
> > > under the simulator.
>
> > > > I am also working on the disassembler, which should be working by the
> > > > end of the week.
>
> > > Sounds great.  There are some disassembler tests for the other
> > architectures
> > > in test/cctest/test-disasm*.cc.  They don't have very good coverage I am
> > > afraid.
>
> > > > This also means I could start sending some code so that somebody in
> > > > the v8 team can review it (last time Erik Corry suggested himself or
> > > > [email protected]). I think we could start with the assembly
> > > > generation, simulator and disassembler stuff. I first need to do a
> > > > little cleaning, so I think we could start everything next week if you
> > > > are ok with it.
>
> > > That sounds great!
>
> > > --
> > > Erik Corry
>
> > --
> > v8-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
-- 
v8-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users

Reply via email to