On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Ryan Dahl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe, but that doesn't solve the problem of associating encoded data > with a string instance so that the next time the string is written to > socket the encoded data is easily accessible. The benchmark I'm > interested in fixing is the case where you write a large string many > times to a socket. > Perhaps this is a silly question: can the external strings be used to hold only a key, which is then used later to do a lookup for the real data in a central table? Or would that interfere with the normal string usage? -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
