On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Michael Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:
> with (o) {
>
Yeah, i was hoping to avoid the 'with'. i assume there is no
clean/portable/sane way to do this in JS, and to be honest the idea never
occurred to me until today while tinkering on my own pet scripting engine
(which, by an accident of design, can do this from either native or script
code, but whether that's a feature or a bug is debatable).
Thanks, Andreas and Michael, for the responses.
--
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
--
--
v8-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
