I never understood why "with" is considered a bad thing. It's got a bad reputation, though it has some real world use cases that make a lot of sense.
Granted v8 doesn't optimize code using it. On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Stephan Beal <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Michael Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > with (o) { > > Yeah, i was hoping to avoid the 'with'. i assume there is no > clean/portable/sane way to do this in JS, and to be honest the idea never > occurred to me until today while tinkering on my own pet scripting engine > (which, by an accident of design, can do this from either native or script > code, but whether that's a feature or a bug is debatable). > > Thanks, Andreas and Michael, for the responses. > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > http://gplus.to/sgbeal > > -- > -- > v8-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "v8-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
