So, myth #5 in the slides seems like the thing that would most likely cause v8 to not know whether objects are marked as unreachable. If I have a context, and a handle scope, that contains objects that reference each other, can't you determine the objects are unreachable if their parent context and handle scope are destroyed?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Sven Panne <[email protected]> wrote: > Before we continue this useless discussion any further: Has anybody > actually *read* Boehm's paper/slides? > > -- > -- > v8-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "v8-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/v8-users/ta9wkdEY08o/unsubscribe?hl=en. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
