On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Dan Carney <[email protected]> wrote: >> Good. >> Will we be able to copy persistent? In my case I have to be able to pass >> around a persistent and store it in several places at a time. >> Or should I wrap it in another object and ref count it myself? > > > It will be copyable, but copying will become more expensive, as the backing > store needs to be copied.
As a counterpoint, I like that Persistent<T> is non-copyable now. It makes it much easier to reason about its life cycle and ownership. I would move to keep it like this. -- -- v8-users mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
