can you paste the following output from a vagrant up (which doesn't work) and one that work:
ifconfig -a route -n On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:25 AM, synack <[email protected]> wrote: > My current setup is DHCP, eth0 is Nat and eth1 is Bridge. The DHCP address > which get's assigned is pingable from my host machine, from other > developers machines, but not from our dev boxes, which are on different > subnets. > > If I boot the machine up via VirtualHost and disable the Nat before bootup > in the config, it all works fine. > > On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 4:42:49 PM UTC-4, Alvaro Miranda Aguilera wrote: >> >> What I recall is, if you network have dhcp, you public network / bridge >> will get an IP and you will be able to use that ip to access from other >> network >> >> eth0 will be nat >> eth1 will be this bridged network. >> >> however, if you use public network / bridge for a fixed ip, then you need >> to check if the gateway can be set from vagrant, if I remember correctly at >> some point wasnt avaliable, and the option was left to do it on the guest >> side (say start up script rc.local, etc) >> >> http://docs.vagrantup.com/v2/networking/public_network.html >> >> Setup a bridge. >> >> Let me know if you have questions around this. >> >> Alvaro >> >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:08 AM, synack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So in otherwords, vagrant isn't going to work correctly, or is there >>> something else I can do to get my dev box, which is on a different subnet, >>> to be able to connect/see the vagrant box? >>> >>> On Thursday, May 15, 2014 7:39:44 PM UTC-4, Alvaro Miranda Aguilera >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Vagrant requires the first network to be nat, and connect over a >>>> forward port to setup the vm. >>>> >>>> So you have a chicken egg, with no nat on eth0, vagrant can't connect >>>> to the guest to setup the 2nd nic. >>>> >>>> Without the nat, vagrant will be able to only turn the guest on, and >>>> shutdown force. >>>> >>>> Alvaro >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:13 AM, synack <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to get a Bridge only setup going, no NAT. I've posted my >>>>> question on superuser, but I thought I would post the link here for a bit >>>>> more exposure as I'm really struggling to get this right. >>>>> >>>>> http://superuser.com/questions/752954/need-to-do-bridged- >>>>> adapter-only-in-vagrant-no-nat/753563?noredirect=1#753563 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for any help >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Vagrant" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Vagrant" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Vagrant" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vagrant" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
