Richard Lawrence wrote: > As for your licensing scheme, Bradley: I guess I don't quite see the > advantage a BSD license offers. Is it just that it is consistent with > the Zend licensing, and that there are no problems if your clients need > to, say, link your code with proprietary libraries? Or do you think a > BSD license encourages people to contribute to FLOSS more than another > license?
Nothing wrong with modified BSD, it is traditional, but a bold choice would be a public domain waiver: neatly side stepping the license wars. -- Anthony Carrico
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
