Hi, On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:08:08PM -0400, Josh Sled wrote: > "Harris, Anthony J" <[email protected]> writes: > > I think the weight of usage might be against you here. Pine is certainly > > cool, and darned fast. But, much as I'm a command-line person myself, I > > think the times they have a changed, to corrupt a song line... > > I understand people still use mutt to great effect. > > And I'm a GNUS person, myself, which will behave better when running > emacs on a proper X display, but degrades gracefully when running over a > text terminal. > > Of course, all email clients suck. They're software, after all.
You're practically quoting from the mutt site [1]://www.mutt.org): "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less." -me, circa 1995 I can't say with certainty that mutt sucks a lot less, because it's never sucked enough for me to bother looking at any of the competition. It is a bit DIY, as are most do-one-thing-and-do-it-well programs. [1] http://www.mutt.org/ -Forest -- Forest Bond http://www.alittletooquiet.net http://www.pytagsfs.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
