hi.
On Nov 5, 2009, at 8:47 PM, Stanley Brinkerhoff wrote:
Its one thing to play fast and loose with broad definitions -- but to
attempt to capture the good will of a development community, a
philosophy,
and an entire mantra is in poor taste. VPR may be community driven
radio --
but to call it "Open Source" only serves to discredit VPR in the
eyes of
true FOSS developers, and to attempt to promote VPR in a capacity it
is not.
Broadcaster confusion about Free vs FOSS continues... At the risk of
promotion, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Source_(radio_show)
http://www.radioopensource.org/
In addition to other experiments in open content:
http://www.kyouradio.com/
Just in case you hadn't heard about these "Open Source" radio
projects... ;-)
have a day.yad
jdpf
