It is a little big project for a one man and in my opinion it is not worth
it.
What do you what to gain with it, more speed when running the executable?
In my opinion VALA produces pretty fast executable even though it produces a
C code...
And It is more simple to find wrong generated code when you have to look on
a C code...


On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Michael B. Trausch <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 08:54 -0400, Levi Bard wrote:
> > > It almost sounds to me like you want a C# compiler that targets real
> > > CPUs instead of targeting the CLI?  You won't find that in Vala.
> >
> > Fortunately, mono already has this feature:
> http://www.mono-project.com/AOT
> >
>
> Kinda-sorta.  AOT-compiled binaries cannot be treated the same as a
> binary generated from the C compiler, they are linked to the machine
> they were AOT'd on (for various reasons).
>
> What I was saying would be something like a C# front-end for GCC that
> would generate a native ELF or PE executable (e.g., no bytecode or any
> of that, just C#->Assembler translation like what C and C++ go through).
>
>        --- Mike
>
> --
> Blog:  http://mike.trausch.us/blog/
> Misc. Software:  http://mike.trausch.us/software/
>
> “The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too
> high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving
> our mark.” —Michelangelo
> _______________________________________________
> Vala-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
>
_______________________________________________
Vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list

Reply via email to