Hi On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Hans Vercammen <[email protected]> wrote: > Another (not uncommon) option would be to distribute syntax files with > the vala tarball, so it always matches the installed release. But I > don't have a strong opinion about this since writing vala code isn't and > shouldn't be favored to any kind of editor. >
I don't think that would be a bad thing, at least for some time. I personally use more emacs than vim, and gedit. But I get along with all of them. In the same way as git as many editor/tools in "extra" (or was it "contrib"), it does not favor any. If the maintainer agrees to have them as part of the release, that would be nice for distributions to package (instead of just a file, living somewhere in a wiki page). regards -- Marc-André Lureau Sent from Barcelona, Spain _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
