On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 00:45 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Hans Vercammen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Another (not uncommon) option would be to distribute syntax files with > > the vala tarball, so it always matches the installed release. But I > > don't have a strong opinion about this since writing vala code isn't and > > shouldn't be favored to any kind of editor. > > I don't think that would be a bad thing, at least for some time. I > personally use more emacs than vim, and gedit. But I get along with > all of them. In the same way as git as many editor/tools in "extra" > (or was it "contrib"), it does not favor any.
Cool, but we probably need some configure options nonetheless. > If the maintainer agrees to have them as part of the release, that > would be nice for distributions to package (instead of just a file, > living somewhere in a wiki page). Much agreed! And it would be much easier to keep them in sync with the vala release. Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
