2009/11/18 Jerry Tan <[email protected]>: > Michael 'Mickey' Lauer : >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 18.11.2009, 09:48 +0100 schrieb pancake: >>> I think Vala core need more maintainers. >> >> While that may be true as well, I think even more important would be a >> split into -language and -bindings, since Vala bindings could and should >> be more often released than Vala language. > > yes, I agree. > > split vala into vala-core and vala-bindings. > > or just like gstreamer, > gstreamer project has gstreamer , gst-plugin-base, gst-plugin-good, > gst-plugin-bad. > > vala can also have vala-core, vala-binding-base, vala-binding-experimental.
I wouldn't take all the hasle to split bindings into multiple packages. The gstreamer example is fine, but in its case these are plugins for codecs which clearly is another level of what is a bad plugin and a good plugin compared to bindings. Bindings are all the same, a text file with public stuff. Perhaps, keep only a useful list of bindings inside vala-core (like the GTK+ stack) and move all the rest to vala-bindings? Or simply everything to vala-bindings, in fact distros are splitting the vala bindings in even smaller packages usually. My 2 cents -- Mike PS: I sent the first time to Jerry only, sorry _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
