On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 11:04 -0400, Sam Wilson wrote:
> Perhaps a better way to do this is like this:
>
> string[] test = new string[3];
> for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
> {
> try
> {
> test[i] = kf.get_string(group, key);
> }
> catch (KeyFile.Error error)
> {
> // Do nothing
> }
> }
> if (!test[0] && !test[1] && !test[3]) return false;
>
> What do you think?
Won't that interrupt the execution flow, i.e. if the first
g_key_file_get_string() throws an exception, the other ones won't be
executed ?
Xav
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
