Aleksander Wabik wrote:
> If there aren't any situations where ';' goes after '}', such
> situations should probably not be introduced. Syntax should be
> consistent. nocatch{} is then probably better than try{};, but I still
> like code attributes solution the most. The feature of pointing out
> exceptions that should be ignored is IMO pure code-generation thing,
> you don't change any logic by using nocatch {} instead of just ignoring
> the exception handling, you change only the generated code.Maybe a different VAPI wrapper for the C function could be written that doesn't generate an exception, if the exception is never useful. So there could be two calls: do_something() and do_something_ignore_error(). Jim -- Jim Peters (_)/=\~/_(_) [email protected] (_) /=\ ~/_ (_) Uazú (_) /=\ ~/_ (_) http:// in Peru (_) ____ /=\ ____ ~/_ ____ (_) uazu.net _______________________________________________ vala-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
