On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Luca Bruno <[email protected]> wrote:
> You should define only the property, not the get_enabled() method. If
> get_enabled() is part of the bindings, that has to be removed from the
> interface as it's a bindings bug.
I've edited the gio-2.0.vapi file and got classes implementing the GLib.Action
interface working. Here is the vapi segment that I think is correct:
public interface Action : GLib.Object {
public abstract void activate (GLib.Variant? parameter);
public abstract void change_state (GLib.Variant value);
public abstract GLib.Variant? get_state_hint ();
public static bool name_is_valid (string action_name);
public static bool parse_detailed_name (string detailed_name,
out string action_name, out GLib.Variant target_value) throws GLib.Error;
public static string print_detailed_name (string action_name,
GLib.Variant parameter);
public abstract bool enabled { get; }
public abstract string name { get; }
public abstract GLib.VariantType? parameter_type { get; }
public abstract GLib.Variant? state { owned get; }
public abstract GLib.VariantType? state_type { get; }
}
However, I haven't been able to edit the Gio-2.0.metadata in a way to generate
the segment above. I'm down to trial-and-error. Vapigen usually gives me
compile warnings or errors. When it is successful, I get [NoAccessorMethod]
which results in a SIGSEGV in the application because the interface function
table isn't populated. Any help getting me to the next step is appreciated.
Cheers,
Ed
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
