On 05/03/2014 07:26, Edward Hennessy wrote:
I've edited the gio-2.0.vapi file and got classes implementing the GLib.Action
interface working. Here is the vapi segment that I think is correct:
public interface Action : GLib.Object {
public abstract void activate (GLib.Variant? parameter);
public abstract void change_state (GLib.Variant value);
public abstract GLib.Variant? get_state_hint ();
public static bool name_is_valid (string action_name);
public static bool parse_detailed_name (string detailed_name,
out string action_name, out GLib.Variant target_value) throws GLib.Error;
public static string print_detailed_name (string action_name,
GLib.Variant parameter);
public abstract bool enabled { get; }
public abstract string name { get; }
public abstract GLib.VariantType? parameter_type { get; }
public abstract GLib.Variant? state { owned get; }
public abstract GLib.VariantType? state_type { get; }
}
However, I haven't been able to edit the Gio-2.0.metadata in a way to generate
the segment above. I'm down to trial-and-error. Vapigen usually gives me
compile warnings or errors. When it is successful, I get [NoAccessorMethod]
which results in a SIGSEGV in the application because the interface function
table isn't populated. Any help getting me to the next step is appreciated.
Thanks for sharing. The girparser has code for detecting such cases and
discard the get_foo for the foo property. It's not something that should
go in the metadata. Girparser should checked too understand the reason
why it doesn't discard get_foo in this case.
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
