On Monday 21 February 2011, Wan Mohd Fairuz Wan Ismail wrote: > I think it's necessary to have an approximate model for each processor (ARM, > PowerPC, etc) since their cache models are different. It might be a good > idea if we can have a better flexibility to use the tool ( eg: the choice of > replacement policy). From what I see, eventhough the tool itself has been > ported to arm, but the cache model used is still x86's.
Hmm.. perhaps the key is to make it easy to adapt the simulator code to your own needs, instead of providing multiple models, which still do not fit everybody's needs. Anyway: I think that support for ARMs pseudo-random replacement strategy for L1 (is this correct?) would be nice to have. You could create a "wishlist" bug report and attach your patch for that. Thanks, Josef ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
