Hi Peng, On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Peng Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > valgrind reports that there is possible lost. But it doesn't seem > there should be any lost. Why valgrind reports it as possible lost? Is > there a way to remove such 'possible lost' from the valgrind report? I've found I'll get the same reports when using global objects.
If you are using global objects, put them in an accessor function. In an accessor, the dtors will run, and you won't violate C++'s rule on non-local statics (and cross module dependencies). If you are not using globals, then accept my apologies. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Using storage to extend the benefits of virtualization and iSCSI Virtualization increases hardware utilization and delivers a new level of agility. Learn what those decisions are and how to modernize your storage and backup environments for virtualization. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51434361/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
