On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peng, > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Peng Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> valgrind reports that there is possible lost. But it doesn't seem >> there should be any lost. Why valgrind reports it as possible lost? Is >> there a way to remove such 'possible lost' from the valgrind report? > I've found I'll get the same reports when using global objects. > > If you are using global objects, put them in an accessor function. In > an accessor, the dtors will run, and you won't violate C++'s rule on > non-local statics (and cross module dependencies).
I don't exactly following your instructions. Would you please show me an concrete example on how to change my simple test code? Thanks! -- Regards, Peng ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Using storage to extend the benefits of virtualization and iSCSI Virtualization increases hardware utilization and delivers a new level of agility. Learn what those decisions are and how to modernize your storage and backup environments for virtualization. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51434361/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
