Hi Philippe, After applying patch shmat is working fine.
Does this patch will be included in the next valgrind release? Thanks and regards, Adishesh On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Adishesh M <adishes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > i will test using patch and update the test results soon. > > Since previous mail was mangled, resending it. > > I have used below program for testing. Below are the steps I have followed. > Compile: gcc -g3 test_shm.c -o test_shm > Create shared memory: ./test_shm –c > Get shared memory without valgrind: ./test_shm –g ( this works fine) > Get with valgrind: /usr/bin/valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full > --track-origins=yes --log-file=/tmp/val_log /home/rtp99/test_shm –g > With valgrind shmat command fails. > > Total shared memory segments active on the my system is 320. > My process will attach to 40 shared memory segments. Shmat will fails > when tested with 14 shared memory attach also. > Total RAM available on my system is 124GB. I am using HP C7000 blade > hardware with RHEL6.2 OS. > I am using 64bit binary. 'file test_shm' command output is > test_shm: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, not > stripped > > Thanks and regards, > Adishesh > > >>Can you try again after applying the attached patch ? > >>Thanks > >>Philippe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
