On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Alexander Potapenko <gli...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Milian Wolff <m...@milianw.de> wrote: >> On Tuesday 19 August 2014 14:23:26 Jan Včelák wrote: >>> OK. Then it is likely that there is a bug in our software. >> >> <snip> >> >>> I run the test case several times without Valgrind with address sanitizer. >>> But I didn't hit the problem. >> >> If you think it's a race, then the address sanitizer won't find it, I guess. >> Rather, try the thread sanitizer. >> >> http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSanitizer.html > > ThreadSanitizer won't comprehend the fence instructions inserted by urcu. > I believe even Helgrind won't, because these instructions do not imply > any happens-before relation.
Is there any opensource or commercial tool which might help in such situations (e.g. problems with memory barriers) ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
