On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 22:11 +0200, David Faure wrote: > > > I'm still trying to find a way to annotate threadsafe-statics so that > > > helgrind doesn't complain about them. > > > > What is a threadsafe-static ? > > See older mail to this list, attached. > > It doesn't use __thread anywhere, but rather lets gcc take care of ensuring > thread-safety on static objects (like C++11 mandates, but it has been doing > so > for a long time already). Quickly re-reading the mail, this is not related. I see that drd has some interceptions that does annotate these like a mutex lock/unlock (see drd/drd_libstdcxx_intercepts.c) and has a test which looks like your problem in drd/tests/local_static.cpp
I think a similar code is (trivially) doable for helgrind, inside helgrind/hg_intercepts.c > Is that related to nptl (I'm not sure what that is exactly)? nptl = new posix thread library (not so new now :). It is just the glibc pthread library. The kludge I am doing is not related to your problem. Philippe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
