> What you can further do is to use the memcheck monitor commands to > examine the definedness of the variables used on the line where the > error is detected. > > See manual for more info > http://www.valgrind.org/docs/manual/mc-manual.html#mc-manual.monitor-commands
Thanks, I didn't know about the "monitor get_vbits" command. However, it seems I'm not able to catch any uninitialized variable. I also get this kind of error in another library: ==17108== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 ==17108== at 0x60BDB6D: decode_rs_char (decode_rs.h:118) ==17108== by 0x41D9B5: Code::decode(unsigned char*, int*, unsigned int, bool) (Code.cpp:114) ==17108== by 0x41E6D8: Code::extract(char*, char*, std::string&, unsigned int) (Code.cpp:326) ==17108== by 0x4060E4: main (test.cpp:178) ==17108== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==17108== at 0x60BD480: decode_rs_char (decode_rs_char.c:15) And with vgdb I get this in gdb: Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. 0x00000000060bdb6d in decode_rs_char (p=0x201aac50, data=0xffefff500 "", eras_pos=0xffefff480, no_eras=22) at decode_rs.h:118 118 tmp = INDEX_OF[lambda[j - 1]]; I tried the get_vbits command in variables p, data, eras_pos and no_eras. I had to manually find out the size of the corresponding variables, since some of them are pointers or structs with pointer fields. I seem to have computed the corresponding sizes correctly since if I use a size 1 byte larger in the vget_bits command I get an "unaddressable" warning (also represented by the underscore). When you say "local variables" you mean the variables the function received as argument or all variables defined inside the function? I think I know the answer, since I remember having discussed this in the mailing list: all variables inside the function are local, thus allocated in the stack, so valgrind is not yet able to detect errors in them? Can you confirm this? I have to try using exp-sgcheck, right? Thanks. -- João M. S. Silva ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users