> But the most probably culprits are either j or lambda[j-1] > or whatever the INDEX_OF macro(is it a macro?) is doing behind > what is visible. > There is no (direct) use of the function args on line 118. > Of course, it might be that e.g. an uninitialised arg (e.g. no_eras > might be unitialised and get a random value 22) might result later in j > or whatever being initialised.
I already tried get_vbits on j (size 4), lambda (size 21) and INDEX_OF = rs->index_of (size 32) and all of them seem initialized (represented with 0 by get_vbits). I also tried --read-var-info=yes but as far as I can see there is no difference in the output. -- João M. S. Silva ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
