On Fri, 8 May 2026 21:34:22 GMT, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> If it's not really an invariant, and we're just doing this for user > convenience, then it makes sense to design for conventional use and not worry > about non-standard bytecode patterns. I prefer this approach. It is already pretty narrow corner case. If a larval value object escapes because non-standard bytecode patterns, the user may experience some inconsistency caused by debugging of a value object construction. It does not look that we have to add more complexity to support this kind of non-standard bytecode patterns. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2412#discussion_r3211588196
