On Mon, 6 Jul 2026 23:36:05 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
> `ValueBased` talks about constructor avoidance but does not specify the > reason. It's better to include the reason because it's not straightforward > from the fact that there's no binary incompatibility. > > Also `InvalidClassException` benefits from descriptions about > strictly-initialized fields. > > --------- > - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK > Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: dd75299b Author: Chen Liang <[email protected]> URL: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/commit/dd75299bab65ea12a0e3b831eb1e58332e4f17c2 Stats: 20 lines in 2 files changed: 7 ins; 0 del; 13 mod 8387749: [lworld] ValueBased.html should be reevaluated for its specification of value class constructors Reviewed-by: dlsmith ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2631
