In message <49aabc95.8090...@schokola.de>, Nils Goroll writes: >Theo, > >> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4641715 >> >> Either that or application level support for timeouts. Given Varnish's >> design, this wouldn't be that hard, but still a bit of work. > >thank you for your answer. I was hoping that someone might had started work on >this, but I understand that this won't be too easy to implement.
They can all be implemented in userland, but at a considerable cost in systemcalls required. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
