In message <[email protected]>, Nils Goroll writes: > > Via: 1.1 varnish (v4) vs. > Via: 1.1 varnish (Varnish/4)
I really don't have an opionion at that level of detail... >Other than that: should we respect the rfc > >* in that we _add_ to any existing Via (which we don't atm)? We append a Via header, if there is one already, that will come first, and I belive Via is one of those headers where you should process all to get the valid result. Obviously, we can append to an existing Via header if we want that instead, but that would make it harder to remove just the Varnish Via again in VCL. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
