2014-03-20 8:37 GMT+01:00 Geoff Simmons <[email protected]>:

> I haven't found a way to read the RFC in such a way that a Via header
> should be added -- all of my attempted parsings say that a hop should
> appended to an existing header. Unless of course I've missed it, or
> unless they use the word "append" in an ambiguous way that encompasses
> both meanings (which unfortunately I wouldn't rule out with this RFC).

See last paragraph of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-4.2
. I think it's pretty clear it's allowed.

- Tollef

_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
  • Via Nils Goroll
    • Re: Via Poul-Henning Kamp
      • Re: Via Geoff Simmons
        • Re: Via Tollef Fog Heen

Reply via email to