Hi Nils, It's actually return(fetch) that will do that from vcl_hit. You can see it in the built-in VCL[1] and I'm afraid it hasn't been documented yet in the 4.0[2] branch, ironically it is documented but deprecated in the trunk[3].
Cheers, Dridi [1] /usr/share/doc/varnish/builtin.vcl [2] https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.0/users-guide/vcl-built-in-subs.html#vcl-hit [3] https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/users-guide/vcl-built-in-subs.html#vcl-hit On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Nils Goroll <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jingyi, > > this has been discussed on irc today: > > You have come up with a useful idea to allow refresh of a cache object > despite a > cache hit, which we want to implement. We'd prefer a different implementation > though and will probably look in the direction of a return(refresh) from > vcl_hit. > > Cheers, Nils > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
