Hi Nils, Please ignore my remarks, except that 4.0 docs are incomplete. I misread everything including the documentation, your email and the discussions on IRC.
I will document the return(fetch) in 4.0 though. Cheers, Dridi On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nils, > > It's actually return(fetch) that will do that from vcl_hit. You can > see it in the built-in VCL[1] and I'm afraid it hasn't been documented > yet in the 4.0[2] branch, ironically it is documented but deprecated > in the trunk[3]. > > Cheers, > Dridi > > [1] /usr/share/doc/varnish/builtin.vcl > [2] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.0/users-guide/vcl-built-in-subs.html#vcl-hit > [3] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/users-guide/vcl-built-in-subs.html#vcl-hit > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Nils Goroll <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Jingyi, >> >> this has been discussed on irc today: >> >> You have come up with a useful idea to allow refresh of a cache object >> despite a >> cache hit, which we want to implement. We'd prefer a different implementation >> though and will probably look in the direction of a return(refresh) from >> vcl_hit. >> >> Cheers, Nils >> >> _______________________________________________ >> varnish-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
