-------- In message <cajv_h0yj-fldhr7qv0pgju1kg_xzkr_0cie3agxkxjwd2re...@mail.gmail.com> , Federico Schwindt writes:
>As I mentioned to Dridi I'm not too thrilled about this. Personally I'm not to thrilled about it being committed without any review... >This pollutes cache.h and causes artificial breakages. I'd prefer, if we >really want to do this, to take the _int.h approach. I have refrained from this myself, because I have a really hard time deciding where the line should be drawn. >I also had a chat with Martin not so long ago and one of the things that >came in that discussion is the possibility of installing all the includes. >This is a step backwards from that. I'm not too thrilled about that either, because that makes everything in varnishd an API seen from a VMOD point of view. (gotta run over at take a tent down...) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
